From glacial streams to great rivers, watercourses are essential to the well-being of our societies, but particularly vulnerable to the effects of human activities. The health of these ecosystems depends on environmental legislation that regulates the activities and installations that can impact them.
In France, since 2015, the Water Act has formalized the legal definition of a watercourse, laying down 3 criteria: possessing a bed of natural origin, being fed by a source other than rainfall alone, and having a sufficient flow for most of the year. On the basis of this definition, the départements were asked to map their territory, using topographic data from the Institut national de l’information géographique et forestière (IGN) and additional expert assessments.
It is against this backdrop that INRAE researchers have assessed the representation of watercourses in France, to better understand the implications of this definition for the protection of freshwater ecosystems.
For this purpose, 91 departmental maps were brought together to create the first national map of watercourses. It includes over 2 million sections totalling 680,000 km, and covers 93% of mainland France (excluding Corsica).
The researchers compared this map with IGN data. As a result, they estimate that around a quarter of the hydrographic sections that appeared on the old river network maps have been classified as non-watercourses.
Intermittent streams (which stop flowing and/or dry up for part of the year) and streams further upstream in watersheds, which are essential for water quality and ecosystem health, are the most vulnerable to disqualification. In fact, the researchers estimate by cartographic analysis that intermittent streams account for 60% of the length of the mapped hydrographic network, but constitute around 80% of the hydrographic sections disqualified as non-watercourses. For the most upstream streams according to IGN maps, the figures are 42% and 56% respectively.
Differences in classification between and within departments were observed. 18 départements constructed a map in which the total length of watercourses was greater than in the IGN database by identifying new watercourses, while 15 other départements disqualified at least 50% of the total length of the hydrographic network as non-watercourses.
These variations between departments and in relation to databases can be explained by different interpretations of the definition of watercourse, particularly with regard to the notion of sufficient flow, by heterogeneous expert resources and by the involvement of local stakeholders in the mapping process. The researchers also observed 1,500 cases of discontinuity in mapping, with, for example, a watercourse surrounded by non-watercourses and vice versa.
This study therefore highlights the complexity of assessing and classifying river sections in France as watercourses, and the need for consistency on a national scale, especially in the context of climate change, where many streams could dry up for part of the year.